Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Anti Semitism is a major error. Its misuse and abuse

 From the Pope's own paper, La Civilta Cattolica, AD 1890


...“The Jewish question of our time doesn’t differ greatly from the one which affected the Christian peoples of the Middle Ages....I

“Nor does the question originate in aversion for a race, as apparently expressed by the improper adjective Semitic that is attached to it. In the first place, the Israelite tribe is not the only one in the world springing from Sem’s most noble blood. Nor can any reason be found why the Aryans, who derive from Japheth, should harbor an inherited hatred for Sem’s offspring, in whose tabernacles, according to Noe’s solemn prophecy,[iii] they even were to live in fraternal harmony. Thus we take the designation Semitic whenever applied to the Jewish question, and Semitism, whenever applied to Judaism, to be inappropriate because in exceeding the scope of their meaning, substituting the whole for a part, they produce a false [if not inflammatory] concept. 

(Synecdoche; rhetoric in which a part signifies the whole)

Nevertheless, aversion to the tribe adds to it and constitutes one of the chapters of the question, the religious codex of the Talmud being another one. Moreover, the Jewish race, in as far as it is a nation, though as such without a fixed fatherland and without a political organism, lives dispersed among the nations, perhaps not without getting mixed with them here and there, but keeping aloof from them in all things which might develop into social union, and regarding them as enemies or even as victims fallen to its greediness. Thus it is that the great Israelite family, dispersed among the peoples of the world, forms a foreign nation within the nations in which it resides, and the sworn enemy of their prosperity, since the cardinal point of Talmudism is the oppression and spoliation of the very peoples who extend hospitality to its disciples. Because of which St. Paul, at the end of his days, characterized the Jews as displeasing God and hostile to all men: Deo non placent, et omnibus hominibus adversantur. [Who (killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and have persecuted us


1 These 2:14 14 For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own countrymen, even as they have from the Jews,  15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;

Saul/Paul was a Jew so obviously the problem with with the Jews is not about DNA or race but about what they believe, who they deny,  and their hatred of Jesus and His Church.

The Catholic Church used to know this and knew how to respond in a peaceful and truthful manner - Sicut Judaeis non - 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicut_Judaeis


But since the fathers of Vatican Two decided to anchor the documents of Vatican Two in Ecumenism * if a Catholic is Anti Jew - which he must be - he has the Racial Supremacist Slur - anti semitic - used against him by the Hierarchy which blackens his good name and  destroys his reputation


https://ia803100.us.archive.org/16/items/civiltacattolicathejewishquestionineurope/Civilta%20Cattolica%20-%20The%20Jewish%20Question%20in%20Europe.pdf


* Focusing on similarities between Catholicism and the false religions while ignoring the much more important matter of the Fullness of Truth.

Truth divides; Luke 12

5Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.  52 For there shall be from henceforth five in one house divided: three against two, and two against three.  53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against his father, the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother, the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.  

Monday, June 1, 2026

Jewish hatred of Catholicism.Do Rabbis warn them about Anti Christianity (just kidding)

 Jew hate Catholics so much that if one of them converts to Catholicism they cease to be considered Jews.

Does this mean that the first Catholics who we know were Jews, are no longer to be considered Jews?

In his great historical study of Judaism, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its impact on world history,  Dr E. Michael Jones quotes the famous Jewish historian, Jacob Neusner, ...While not all Jews practice Judaism,, in the iron clad consensus among contemporary Jews, Jews who practice Christianity cease to be part of the ethnic Jewish  community, while those who practice Buddhism remain within .

Dr. Jones then quotes the well known Jewish convert, Roy Schoeman; I remember praying, Let me know your name - I don't mind if you are Buddha, and I have to become a Buddhist; I don't mind if  you are Apollo, and I have to become a Roman pagan; I don't mind if you are Krishna, and I have to become a Hindu; as long as you are not Christ and I have to become a Christian.

Dr Jones then footnotes a fascinating bit of history about the conversion of a Jew, Oswald Rufeisen, who became Brother Daniel,  a Carmelite monk,

He appealed for Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return on the grounds of his ethnicity. His appeal was rejected by the Israeli government on the grounds of his conversion to Catholicism (decision upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court).

Finally the decision (at Rufenstein v  minister of the Interior (1962) 16 PD2428 ) , was that any Jew converting to another religion would lose their preferential access to Israeli citizenship.

Now, it is commonly understood that our Hierarchy is woefully, and inexcusably, ignorant of the History of the Jews and their actions which is why they are always haranguing us about our putative anti semitism without ever defining it, saying nothing about us Faithful being guilty of it.

Not one of them would be caught dead with the study of Dr. Jones in their possession owing to the success of Dynamic Silence * which has been applied to Dr Jones with a vengeance.

But, it is so irksome and silly the way they carry on protecting the reputation of  Jews who hate their guts, reject Jesus and reject the Father who  sent  Him and hate Jesus and hate the  Father who sent Him.

Owing to what the Jews are doing, fewer of the faithful take them seriously when they excoriate the faithful for their putative sins against the Jews while they remain silent about who the Jews are, what they believe, what they do and, apparently, owing to their DNA/Racial Supremacism, can break any and all of the Ten Commandments with impunity.

* Dynamic Silence was invented by Rabbi Feinberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947 as a method of closing off all access to the public media - and thus the larger culture - for people or organizations deemed to have an unacceptable point of view. In spite of minor changes and adaptations, it can still be understood as being comprised of two parts. In the first part, unfavored individuals are denied unmediated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavored individuals are reported. This starts a downward spiral of de-legitimization in the public eye in which the harder unfavored individuals try to get public exposure, the more negative and unflattering that exposure becomes until, finally, nobody wants to be associated with the ideas of beliefs of the unfavored individuals.”

'